Throughout watching the excellent doco-series of “The Last Dance”, I always had the nagging question to myself of how critical Phil Jackson was and what steps did he take in creating the ideal atmospheres (or controlling Jordan’s high expectations of others) for the group as a whole to excel? The further we get into “The Last Dance,” the more we learn that Jackson was not only an X’s and O’s coach, but he also had a high level of emotional intelligence, which put him ahead of his time. From Jordan wanting to be “the guy,” or Pippen wanting to sit out, to Rodman wanting a 48-hour “vacation,” Jackson had a true understanding of the team and the individuals within it. Most coaches in this situation probably could not have handled all the twists and turns that Jackson faced.

Past research regards the “actions of coaches as (possibly) the most critical motivational influences within sport setting” and therefore, coaching should be recognised as an educational dynamic relationship, where the coach can satisfy player’s goals and development but both sides have an investment of will capital, where human initiative and intentionality are both dedicated to show commitment towards goals and relationships. But with all the various needs of athletes and limitations of time, resources and abilities of coaches and their developers, could a formula be proposed for getting the coaching ballance right??

I wanted to reflect on my recent pieces of writing combined with some posts and podcasts I have listened to this week. I’ve listened to a couple of great podcasts last weekend, The Talent Equation where Stuart, Mark Bennett and Alan Keane talked of how they’re focusing on the term “need centred” or “needs led coaching” as opposed to “athlete centred”; this was followed by the Flying Coach Podcast where coaching greats Steve Kerr and Pete Carroll, both of whom I have written about before, discuss what’s really important to coaching great teams and how you need to be comfortable in yourself to serve your players in an authoritative manner. So, while I’ve addressed and believe in the importance of how coaching techniques and certainly the importance of coach-athlete relationships have increased with our new age players, alongside how being aware of your athletes should structure and shape your practice design and coaching methodologies, are we able to recognise what athlete centred coaching looks like and are we able to develop connection, understanding and care to offer players what they need throughout their sporting journey?

Quoting Andy Farrell, “The team is a reflection of you as a coach. Players want to play for a coach who cares about them.” Recent piece of writing looking at comments made by Ireland Head Coach Farrell and other sources of information, asking us to reflect and question our coaching processes and methodologies, understanding what is REALLY important to your athletes or how to make an impact with your coaching group. I also aim to answers questions forwarded around ensuring the players are enjoying the game while technically developing the individuals.

New article, looking at and discussing a few articles I’ve shared early 2020 via Twitter, addressing ideas around practice design, athlete-led learning and how techniques such as game-based ideas both engage and encourage players in team based sports. Review of methods recognising the importance of understanding the backgrounds of the players plus the needs of the group or individuals and structuring practice where athletes are required to be creative, adaptive and make decisions which shall transfer into competitive environments.